![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IPBRG Investigators: Spence Behmer, Andy Boswell, Steve Cook, Karl Roeder, Rachel Wynalda Collaborators: Roger Gold (TAMU), Micky Eubanks (TAMU), Anthony Joern (KSU), | ||
Two key ideas drive this area of research. First, physiological mechanisms can provide unique insights into ecological patterns and processes. Second, animal behavior provides a window through which physiology can be viewed. Much of what we do under the remit of physiological ecology centers on nutritional physiology and the mechanisms associated with resource use. Additionally, where possible, we use a comparative approach to gain insights into the evolution of physiological processes and mechanisms.
Knowing how insects use available resources provides the foundation for understanding a variety of issues, ranging from individual behavior up to population and community level processes. Over the past few years we have been exploring resource use in herbivorous insects with the aid of a recently developed experimental approach, called the 'Geometric Framework' (GF), which emphasizes nutrient regulation. The GF is unique in that it allows for clear descriptions to be made of the foraging compromises and tradeoffs insect herbivores make when confronted with foods that vary nutritionally, contain defensive compounds and/or are variously distributed in the environment. We also use the experimental approach of the GF to study post-ingestive physiological processes. For example, by measuring body nitrogen and lipid content, we are able to examine issues related to resource utilization efficiency. Locusts, grasshoppers and caterpillars are our primary study organisms, but recently we have extended our investigations to ants.
We have also studied, within a nutritional context, how the interplay between plant nutrients and allelochemicals affects insect herbivores. Our work shows that the extent to which herbivores ingest defensive compounds depends on the nature of the compound (whether it is carbon- or nitrogen-based), as well as the nutrient content (protein-carbohydrate ratio) of available foods (Behmer et al. 2002; Behmer et al. in prep). Additionally, our work suggests that the deterrent effect of a C-containing defensive compound (e.g. tannic acid) increases as protein content decreases, but that the opposite appears to be true for a N-containing defensive compound (e.g. gramine). A particularly novel finding is that tolerance towards toxic and deleterious compounds increases as nutrient intake approaches optimal levels. Combined, these results are helping to clarify various plant-defense theories.
We have also investigated the extent to which physiological processes and traits associated with resource use in plant-feeding insects can evolve and are heritable. Here diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) larvae were reared for multiple generations in a quasi-natural selection experiment on Arabidopsis starch mutants or chemically defined synthetic foods with fixed nutritional differences (Warbrick-Smith et al. 2006). Results from these experiments indicate that plant macronutrient content interacts with patterns of nutritional heterogeneity in the environment to influence the evolution and expression of physiological and behavioral traits, including ovipositional preferences.
Finally, we are interested in the physiological adaptations herbivores employ for dealing with plants that contain heavy metals (Behmer et al. 2005). Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy metals have drawn interest for their phytoremediation potential, but they are also interesting in that they might be involved in mediating biotic interactions with plant-feeding insects, in a manner analogous to plant-produced allelochemicals. Additionally, because heavy-metal hyperaccumulation is a recent phenomenon in plants, interesting evolutionary questions pertaining to host use can be asked. | ||
Key Publications:
Behmer, S.T. and Joern, A. (2008) Coexisting generalist herbivores occupy unique
Warbrick-Smith, J., Behmer, S.T., Lee, K.P., Raubenheimer, D. and Simpson, S.J. (2006)
Lee, K.W., Behmer, S.T. and Simpson, S.J. (2006) Nutrient regulation in relation to diet
Behmer, S.T., Lloyd, C.M., Raubenheimer, D., Stewart-Clark, J., Knight, J., Leighton, R.S.,
Simpson, S.J., Sibly, R.M., Lee, K., Behmer, S.T. and Raubenheimer, D. (2004) Optimal foraging
Opstad, R., Rogers, S.M., Behmer, S.T. and Simpson, S.J. (2004) Behavioural correlates
Behmer, S.T., Raubenheimer, D. and Simpson, S.J. (2003) The effects of distance between
Lee, K.P., Raubenheimer, D, Behmer, S.T. and Simpson, S.J. (2003) A correlation between
Behmer, S.T., Simpson, S.J. and Raubenheimer, D. (2002) Herbivore foraging in chemically
van der Zee, B., Behmer, S.T. and Simpson, S.J. (2002) Food mixing strategies in the
Lee, K.W., Behmer, S.T., Raubenheimer, D. and Simpson, S.J. (2002) A geometric analysis of
Simpson, S.J., Raubenheimer, D., Behmer, S.T., Whitworth, A. and Wright, G.A. (2002)
Behmer, S.T., Raubenheimer, D. and Simpson, S.J. (2001) Frequency-dependent food
Frazier, M.R., Harrison, J.F. and Behmer, S.T. (2000) Effects of diet on titratable acid-base
Joern, A. and Behmer, S.T. (1998) Impact of diet quality on demographic attributes in adult
Joern, A. and Behmer, S.T. (1997) Importance of dietary nitrogen and carbohydrates to survival,
Chambers, P., Sword, G., Angel, J., Behmer, S. and Bernays, E.A. (1996) Foraging by
Behmer, S. and Joern, A. (1994) The influence of proline on diet selection: sex-specific feeding
Behmer, S. and Joern, A. (1993) Diet choice by a grass-feeding grasshopper based on the need | |||||||||||||